Proposal Land

Better RFP Responses & Management
 
Proposal Land

Dismantling Writer’s Block

 

From an unlikely source (vis-à-vis Proposal Land, at any rate – J. Budziszewski is a professor of government and philosophy at the University of Texas at Austin), specific suggestions for countering writer’s block, no matter its source:

  • Distraction
  • Inertia
  • Blankness
  • Sculptor’s anxiety
  • Destination anxiety
  • Fear of failure
  • Fear of rejection

Read it and unblock yourself, whether you’re writing an RFP or a response thereto.

Or read this:

Just the facts, ma’am

 

Are you responsible for drafting RFPs? Do you ever wonder how to get good information on a company’s experience? Start by understanding the game you’re in.

https://twitter.com/Bornakang/status/1685724195513139201

Everyone is doing to their experience section what this person is doing to their resume. Or trying, at least.

So, it behooves you to craft your questions to get the answers you need: A little less talk, a lot more data.

 

See also this post: Forms.

 

How to Describe Yourself

 
Here’s a super article. It bangs on (but in a funny way sezme) about poor word choices, mostly in resumes and profiles.
It applies equally well to experience claims in proposals. I spent 30 years in Proposal Land trying to get people to stop doing these same dagnabbed things, and digging it out after the fact (when I could – sometimes, executive override applied).

More Advice on ChatGPT

  itemprop="discussionURL"2

No, not my advice: that of a professor of science who also teaches scientific writing.

What happens when ChatGPT
writes an entire scientific paper?

I suspect that his caveats on the use of ChatGPT in scientific papers apply equally to proposals. In case you don’t have the time or interest to read the whole thing, here are the highlights:

  • ChatGPT requires lots of human input–prompts, guidance, judgement–to generate even marginally usable writing.
  • ChatGPT makes stuff up: not maliciously, but precisely because it’s programmed to fill gaps with plausible (or, perhaps, “right sounding”) bits. In science papers that’s often fake citations: proposal teams can look forward to fake experience examples or performance results.
  • ChatGPT delivers pedestrian science (in his example) precisely because it’s aping existing text and repeating existing hypotheses. For the same reason, you can expect it to deliver pedestrian solutions for a client’s requirement. Just as there’s no new science being done here, there’s no business/operational creativity on offer here either.
  • ChatGPT replicates all the bad habits of science writers, including the passive voice and tortuous sentences and paragraphs. It would do the same for proposal writers, presumably. Oh, hurray.

So, how could you use ChatGPT in Proposal Land? Read this.